Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of string quartets by composer: B
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Espresso Addict 16:35, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- List of string quartets by composer: B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
These (I am nominating three) articles were apparently part of an aborted attempt to list string quartets using a series of alphabetical articles. Of that attempt apparently only three pages were ever created, probably because the concept was rendered totally redundant by the article List of string quartet composers and the category Category:Compositions for string quartet. These pages are pointless leftovers from a good idea that some one else already thought of. There is no point in keeping these orphaned “B” “G” and “M” articles (the only ones still remaining). S.dedalus 06:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are part of an attempted set of alphabetical list articles:
- List of string quartets by composer: G (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- List of string quartets by composer: M (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Delete per nomination. --S.dedalus 06:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Torc2 06:53, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Let's put them to rest, the idea that supported their creation has abandoned them a long time ago.--Lenticel (talk) 08:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Obsolete idea. Xoloz 13:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a good concept that just didn't pan out; RIP for the orphans. SkierRMH 02:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. CRGreathouse (t | c) 17:55, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.